|
Post by George Ortega on Sept 5, 2014 19:37:53 GMT
The claim is that there is high levels in mercury in a fish diet. In the article it states, "blaming a mercury-rich sushi diet and possibly use of herbal medicine. His doctor says test revealed Piven has mercury levels five to six times higher than normal." This shows how there is more mercury than there is suppose to be and that what it is baissaclly about how this isn't really good diet. It also states, "The etiology is unclear, but his level of mercury was uncharacteristically high." This is important because like I said in the claim there is high levels of mercury in the diet and since he is taking the diet it shows up in his test that he has been taking up lots of mercury through the diet.
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Cuevas on Sept 5, 2014 19:40:57 GMT
I do not think that Jeremy Piven had mercury poisoning because he didn't have any symptoms of it. Since he ate fish and used herbal medicine then he should've had problems with his nervous system because of the organic mercury but he didn't. "Proven has mercury levels five to six times higher than normal..." The doctor stated this but this doesn't mean that he had mercury poison it just meant that his mercury levels were higher than they were suppose to be, it could've just been a coincidence. "A person with no symptoms, no changes physically, or chemically." Piven didn't have any changes in his nervous system or in anywhere. The article itself says that no mercury levels are normal, therefore I don't think that Piven had mercury poisoning he just had it higher than the average human.
|
|
|
Post by Adrian Dang on Sept 5, 2014 19:42:21 GMT
The authors claim is to be aware of mercury poisoning and to know the symptoms. His doctor said, "...has mercury levels five or six times higher than normal." This is important because we know that having mercury levels above average can be very dangerous and can cost your life. In the text it says, "metal mercury, is found in thermometers...mercury salt, which are basically industrial...organic mercury is what gets into the food chain." This supports the claim because the author wants us to know the different types of mercury out there so we can be aware.
|
|
|
Post by Armondo Marin on Sept 5, 2014 19:45:51 GMT
I believe that Jeremy Pivin could have had mercury poisoning because it states in the article, "It doesn't become poisoning under the true definition unless someone has had physical or chemical changes in his or her body." Though it doesn't say symptoms like problem with kidneys, urination, respiratory, etc. it does show chemical change in his body by having 5-6 times higher than normal levels of mercury in his system. Also he could be having a symptom of feeling out of whack because the doctor made him start a fish-free diet and rest. If he was just exposed rather than poisoned I feel he wouldn't need the break that the doctors are telling him to have. I'm pretty sure an actor wouldn't like to discuss personal problems like urination in public so just because the article doesn't say he had symptoms he probably did otherwise he wouldn't have gone to the doctor in the first place. Since he needs, " convalescence and rest and treatment," shows he obviously is more than just exposed to high mercury.
|
|
|
Post by Richard b on Sept 5, 2014 19:49:44 GMT
The authors claim is that if you get exposed to mercury for too long you can get mercury poisoning. He knows this by research of people who have been exposed to mercury too long and those people suffer from problems of the kidney which affects the ability to urinate or feeling out of wack because of renew dysfunction.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Trujillo on Sept 5, 2014 19:50:17 GMT
The author claims that Jeremy Piven may or may not have mercury poisoning. Mercury poisoning is different to being exposed to mercury because if your poisoned then you will show symptoms and blood or tissue level will rise. Although, it is believed that Jeremy was only exposed to the mercury. In the article it states," a person with no symptoms, no changes physically or chemically, we just say they've been exposed and have high mercury level. It doesn't become poisoning under the true definition unless someone has had a physical of chemical change in his or her blood." This means that he may have just been exposed to the mercury. There is no normal level which means you will need to see symptoms I order to decide if the person has mercury poisoning or not. In the article it states," if occupational - you've been exposed to this for many, many years and you've physically damaged the nervous system - that May or may not reverse." The author is trying to say that this can have long lasting effects on your life and can cause damage.
|
|
|
Post by Armondo Marin on Sept 5, 2014 19:50:28 GMT
I do not think that Jeremy Piven had mercury poisoning because he didn't have any symptoms of it. Since he ate fish and used herbal medicine then he should've had problems with his nervous system because of the organic mercury but he didn't. "Proven has mercury levels five to six times higher than normal..." The doctor stated this but this doesn't mean that he had mercury poison it just meant that his mercury levels were higher than they were suppose to be, it could've just been a coincidence. "A person with no symptoms, no changes physically, or chemically." Piven didn't have any changes in his nervous system or in anywhere. The article itself says that no mercury levels are normal, therefore I don't think that Piven had mercury poisoning he just had it higher than the average human. I disagree with you because since there was a change in Mercury levels inside his body it is a poisoning rather than a exposure. He could've had other symptoms but didn't want it to be public.
|
|
|
Post by Richard b on Sept 5, 2014 19:51:11 GMT
I do not think that Jeremy Piven had mercury poisoning because he didn't have any symptoms of it. Since he ate fish and used herbal medicine then he should've had problems with his nervous system because of the organic mercury but he didn't. "Proven has mercury levels five to six times higher than normal..." The doctor stated this but this doesn't mean that he had mercury poison it just meant that his mercury levels were higher than they were suppose to be, it could've just been a coincidence. "A person with no symptoms, no changes physically, or chemically." Piven didn't have any changes in his nervous system or in anywhere. The article itself says that no mercury levels are normal, therefore I don't think that Piven had mercury poisoning he just had it higher than the average human. I agree with you Ariel because he doesn't give any real prof that he has it
|
|
|
Post by Jaz brown on Sept 5, 2014 21:47:49 GMT
Jeremy said that he didn't have any issues. And it was "five to six times higher than normal. This man was not poisoned.Also he has been taking herbal medicine so that might have had a affect on him not the mercury. The author is telling the audience that "no level of mercury is normal". And he had no physical changes as well as chemically changes.
|
|
|
Post by Jaz brown on Sept 5, 2014 21:49:07 GMT
I do not think that Jeremy Piven had mercury poisoning because he didn't have any symptoms of it. Since he ate fish and used herbal medicine then he should've had problems with his nervous system because of the organic mercury but he didn't. "Proven has mercury levels five to six times higher than normal..." The doctor stated this but this doesn't mean that he had mercury poison it just meant that his mercury levels were higher than they were suppose to be, it could've just been a coincidence. "A person with no symptoms, no changes physically, or chemically." Piven didn't have any changes in his nervous system or in anywhere. The article itself says that no mercury levels are normal, therefore I don't think that Piven had mercury poisoning he just had it higher than the average human. I disagree with you because since there was a change in Mercury levels inside his body it is a poisoning rather than a exposure. He could've had other symptoms but didn't want it to be public.
|
|
|
Post by Joseph Lorenzo on Sept 5, 2014 21:52:58 GMT
I think Jeremy Pivin did get mercury poisoning because it mentions it in the text. In the text it said "we're not sure if it's from his diet, which is high in fish". In the article it talks about mercury is found in fish and certain species have certain types of mercury levels also it doesn't matter if you cook the fish or not because the mercury levels will only change slightly. It also says in the text "Chinese herbs, which he's been a fan of in the past, or a combination of both." In the text it said that Herbal medicines outside the country can contain certain qualities of toxic mercury.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew Aquino on Sept 5, 2014 21:53:14 GMT
Mr. Pivin did not have mercury poisoning.
According to the document, you can detect poisoning if you have problems urinating, if they have renal dysfunction, if they had flue, if they are easily distracted, if they have motor trouble, heart palpitations or anemia. To our information, Mr. Pivin had said he only discovered he has high levels of mercury. He did not say that he experienced any of the symptoms, which proves that he did not have poisoning.
Another piece of evidence is that Mr. Pivin's doctor, Dr. Colker, said that he merely needs rest and treatment. Poisoning requires the guidance of a toxicologist. Dr. Colker is an internist. He has also quoted to the author of the document that Pivin "needs convalescence and rest and treatment, and this will clear his body and he will be back inaction verysoon". Had Pivin been poisoned, he would need much more than rest, let alone an internet tell him that without the aid of a toxicologist. This means that Pivin is merely exposed.
|
|
|
Post by Ebony Alamillo P:6 on Sept 5, 2014 21:57:28 GMT
Jermy Piven wasn't or didn't have mercury poisoned because his doctor said that " We're not sure f this is from his diet, which is high in fish, or Chinese herbs, which he's been a fan of in the past, or combination of both. He needs convalescence and rest and treatment, and this will clear his body and he will be back in action very soon." They think it may have been the food that Jermy ate because he is always eating fish and he just needs to rest up and be better soon. In conclusion they are saying that it could have happened in the past but it didn't maybe the mercury was changing every time but then it just got to him.
|
|
|
Post by Osman garcia on Sept 5, 2014 22:00:15 GMT
I think Jeremy pivin Rosen have mercury poisoning beacuse I feel like he had mercury exposer. In the article is say when you have mercury poising you experience anemia , feeling very tired ,easy bleeding or bruising. In the article the man didn't experience none of these symptoms in the way he said it. I believe it just to be mercury exposure and not a mercury poisoning. He also didn't have any physical changes in his body he only had his mercury levels rise as it says " five to six higher than normal" it ever nothing about sympoth or anything else like that.
|
|
Stephanie Ortega -Period:6
Guest
|
Post by Stephanie Ortega -Period:6 on Sept 5, 2014 22:00:40 GMT
In this article the article describes the differences between Mercury Exposure vs. Mercury Poisioning , but it states that "it doesn't state that it's posion because it's just a fact." So , basically it is just being exposed to Jermey but not hurting him any any kind of way at all. In Jermey Piven results it says that he has only gotten mercury levels high but it isn't bad for him, because it states that a person with no symptoms will not have no changes physically neither chemically change too so he just has a high mercury level.
|
|