|
|
Post by June Martinez on Dec 8, 2014 22:39:51 GMT
My partner is Andrea
1) ethonal helps the environment and the atmosphere . Refuses green house gases in Brazil.
2) I think what she was trying to say is that this source was better becasue it does not cause as much pollution says other sources .
3) Ethonal uses corn and it is reducing our food supply isn't this a bad thing becasue it is still affecting us in a bad way ?
1) " If your energy source (nuclear energy) is the only one to be used it is still dangerous because of the chemicals that is being emitted ? "
1) Doesn't it leak ? (Natural gas )
1) Clarified from what Amy was saying : Ethonal is better becasue it is more powerful land if we use it to its full potential it could reduse gas emissions by 90% .
1) Production of biofuels helps create jobs witch is needed in America ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Malayao on Dec 8, 2014 23:05:36 GMT
David
1. To summarize what David said was nuclear power plant cost a lot of the money, but there is a benefit to that. It will create job opportunities that the U.S. lacks. Nuclear waste could damage the environment and humans. Nuclear waste could be made into plastic and generate money for the U.S.
2. What I think David was trying to say was where is Algae grown in the U.S.
3. I think what David said was misunderstood; I think what he meant was where is Algae produced of biofuels will need them to create energy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ben Amaya on Dec 8, 2014 23:05:50 GMT
Summarizing what Lupe said, she is saying that biofuels can be used basically whenever they have an abundance, and there is also other types of biofuels which don't require actual crops such as biofuels 2.0. They say that theyx an also use things such as algae and waste from farmland.
What I think Lupe was trying to say the biofuels don't only need food crops in order to create fuels. It instead can create energy through other ways such as algae and dead food crops, and also many other ways as well.
Your idea of harming the ecosystem was flawed Lupe, I think you meant to say that it can be re-created in order to allow the habitats creatures to not be effected by the demand for the land.
Lupe, let us say we were to switch to biofuels 2.0 or just regular, how will we compensate for these things in order to keep our economy and food source the same or better?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ibrahim on Dec 8, 2014 23:12:34 GMT
Edgar said, I dissagree with you Chris because there isn't always winds so there wouldn't be power to power homes
Edgar said, the U.S. doesn't use nuclear energy as an energy source because it cost lots of money
Edgar said, everyone dies so there is a point to going at war for an oil resource
Edgar saI'd, I agree with nick money was a problem when it comes to nuclear energy it's just better when it comes to wars fought over oil
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrea Hernandez on Dec 8, 2014 23:13:02 GMT
June Martinez
Summarize:"What would happen to the waste?"
Clarify: What would you do about the toxic waste coming from Nuclear energy?
What would be the solution to the dangerous leaks that natural gas releases?
|
|
|
|
Post by David Olvera on Dec 8, 2014 23:13:17 GMT
My partner Mark Malayao said,
Hydroelectric would benefit the U.S because it's clean, it can also be near rivers or dams. Better solutions than most fuels. Pump storage can recycle water.
Will we have it buy crops from other countries if we switch to biofuels?
|
|
|
|
Post by Matthew Garion on Dec 8, 2014 23:14:02 GMT
Partner: Nick
1. We can sit here our whole life. They should make compromises, climate changes happen. We have to work together maybe make natural habitats. Change energy source per environment. Leading reason for Iraq war was oil.
2. N/A
3. How would making naturl habitats change the way the energy sources work?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashley on Dec 9, 2014 14:49:48 GMT
"How about birds that died".
"it is grow in a lab"
"What is one possible solution".
"What happens when there's a melt down".
Kayla but we are already using bio fuel. But think about the con it will end up balancing itself.
"What nick is trying to say is that it's better to found a nuclear power plant instead of founding a war".
"were all going to die ether through war or nuclear fallout".
Ashley
|
|
|
|
Post by Aron Mey on Dec 9, 2014 17:49:55 GMT
Geronimo Flores:
1. Geronimo clarified and summed up on what Valerie and stated, "every source is bad but it's on how we use it, for example my source was nuclear energy and although we emit tons of energy it powers the U,S.
2. He asked Ricky a clarifying question and challenged him to further his thinking by saying, "what happens if we just have corn, it can't only run on that, it needs to have other sources.
3. Geronimo said is he thinks nuclear powers does not pollute as much as fossil fuels.
4. He asked what happens if there is not enough corn to go around and it turns out corn will not be for food anymore but used just for fuel.
5. Worlds uranium sorce is very abundant at the moment and won't run out as fast as other sources because it's looked upon.
6. He connected to environmental class last year and said corn is not good because it is gmo
|
|
